Comparison of accuracy of gynecologic ultrasound with IOTA scoring, frozen section, intraoperative gross assessment of the specimen and routine histopathology report in diagnosing ovarian malignancy: a retrospective cross-sectional analytic study
Publication Date
2019
Document Type
Research
Abstract
This retrospective cross-sectional analytic study from January 2016 until December 2019 compared the accuracy of gynecologic ultrasound with IOTA scoring, frozen section, intraoperative assessment of the specimen and routine histopathology report in diagnosing ovarian malignancy. There were 332 patients included in this study. Of these, 212 patients were confirmed to have ovarian malignancy. The median age, gravidity, and parity were 48 (range 10-78) years old. Gravida 2 Para 2 and 53% of the patients were already menopause. Overall, the most common diagnoses were the following: mature cystic teratoma and endometriotic cyst among the benign type of tumors, while mucinous adenocarcinoma and serous carcinoma among the malignant types.
APA Citation
Dela Rea, Mariel Anne C., "Comparison of accuracy of gynecologic ultrasound with IOTA scoring, frozen section, intraoperative gross assessment of the specimen and routine histopathology report in diagnosing ovarian malignancy: a retrospective cross-sectional analytic study" (2019). Resident Research. 186.
https://greenprints.dlshsi.edu.ph/resident-research/186