Date of Completion
2023
Document Type
Research Project
Degree Name
Grade 12
Keywords
digital note-taking, traditional note-taking, 21st century critical thinking skills, anatomy, and physiology
Abstract
Note-taking has evolved through time where various methods and mediums are being used to aid a student’s learning. This study aims to determine the effects of traditional and digital note-taking on the 21st Century Critical Thinking Skills of health allied students in the subject Anatomy and Physiology. To determine the respondents’ perceived positive and negative effects of traditional and digital note-taking, the researchers utilized the purposive sampling technique by administering an online survey questionnaire via Google Forms. Utilizing the mixed method research design, data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Quantitative (58.9%) and qualitative (61.54%) findings showed that the majority of the 107 respondents prefer digital note-taking. There is also a positive correlation between critical thinking in terms of systematic analysis and thinking outside the box, while most of the respondents were neutral on the subtheme thinking within the box. Considering the perceived negative and positive effects of two note-taking methods, respondents’ overall preference is digital note-taking. Future researchers can explore other 21st century skills and note-taking methods to cater the students’ learning needs.
First Advisor
Fredyrose Ivan L. Pinar
APA Citation
Cortez, R. C., Lucena, H. D., Mojica, A. A., Sierra, C. P., & Velante, C. T. (2023). The effects of traditional note-taking and digital note-taking on the 21st century critical thinking skills of health allied students in anatomy and physiology. [Research output, De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute]. GreenPrints. https://greenprints.dlshsi.edu.ph/grade_12/511