Computer-aided detection for esophageal achalasia (with video)

Authors

Hironari Shiwaku, Fukuoka University
Masashi Misawa, Showa University Yokohama Northern Hospital
Haruhiro Inoue, Showa University
Kai Jiang, Nagoya University
Masahiro Oda, Nagoya University
Pietro Familiari, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Guido Costamagna, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Yuto Shimamura, Showa University
Yuichiro Ikebuchi, Tottori University
Yugo Iwaya, Shinshu University
Masaki Ominami, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine
Bu'Hussain Hayee, King's College Hospital
Khek Yu Ho, National University Hospital
Jimmy B.Y. So, National University Hospital
Hein Myat Thu Htet, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust
Pradeep Bhandari, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust
Kevin Grimes, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
Helmut Messmann, Augsburg Medical Center
Bianca Maria Quarta Colosso, Ecclesiastical Institution Regional General Hospital
Roberta Maselli, Humanitas University
Cesare Hassan, Humanitas University
Alessandro Repici, Humanitas University
Stavros N. Stavropoulos, NYU Langone Hospital—Long Island
Norio Fukami, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale-Phoenix, Arizona
Robert Bechara, Queen’s University
Michel Kahaleh, Rutgers University–New Brunswick
Amrita Sethi, Columbia University Irving Medical Center
Torsten Beyna, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
Horst Neuhaus, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf
Philip W.Y. Chiu, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Medicine
Esperanza Grace Santi, De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute
Prateek Sharma, VA Medical Center
Nikolas Eleftheriadis, Metropolitan Hospital, Athens

Publication Date

1-1-2025

Document Type

Article

Publication Title

Digestive Endoscopy

Abstract

Objectives: Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder that impairs quality of life and is often missed (20–50%) on endoscopy. A newly developed computer-aided detection (CAD) software has shown high accuracy for achalasia diagnosis in preclinical settings. However, its benefit in a clinical setting remains unclear. Methods: Between February and August 2023, 83 endoscopists from 27 centers assessed 50 randomized endoscopic videos (25 achalasia, 25 nonachalasia) without and with CAD. Endoscopists assessed videos without CAD, then with CAD after 2 months. The primary end-point was improvement in sensitivity for nonexperienced endoscopists (no endoscopic experience of achalasia). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with and without CAD were compared using the McNemar test. Results: Sensitivity for diagnosing achalasia increased significantly with CAD, rising from 74.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.2–76.0%) to 91.2% (95% CI 89.9–92.4%) for all readers, showing a difference of 17.1% (95% CI 15.1–19.0%). Specifically, sensitivity improved from 66.9% (95% CI 63.6–70.0%) to 91.9% (95% CI 89.9–93.6%) among nonexperienced endoscopists, resulting in a difference of 25.0% (95% CI 21.7–28.4%), and from 79.5% (95% CI 77.1–81.8%) to 90.8% (95% CI 89.0–92.3%) among experienced endoscopists (endoscopic experience of at least one achalasia case), with a difference of 11.3% (95% CI 8.9–13.6%). Accuracy and specificity improved significantly with CAD assistance, regardless of reader's experience. Conclusion: CAD improves achalasia detection by 17%, confirming preclinical results. The benefit was higher for nonexperienced endoscopists. CAD assistance may lead to prompt and effective treatment, minimizing the risk of false-negative diagnosis in clinical practice. Trial registration: This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/) number: UMIN000053047.

To view the document, please click the DOI link after the APA Citation.

Share

COinS